Tuesday, April 29, 2014

24. Research Paper



Knowing the Difference
                One of the basic concepts of writing is knowing how to properly write a summary.  Not many students will agree that it is one of the most important things to know, because some think that not every major works with summaries, but actually what people fail to realize is that there is more than one way to do a summary.  While it is something that everyone should of possibly learned at a very young age, possibly in grammar school, how to do and understand, it is not well known that plot summaries are not the only forms of a summary.  Interpretation, explaining something from your point of view, is another way to write a summary.
            As a college student, when given an assignment that says to write a summary, unless addressed to do something otherwise, most would assume to write a plot summary.  But when speaking to Dr. Chandler she had expressed how when her students give her plot summaries, it is not what she asked for, she is looking for interpretations.  Most would agree with me, unless told otherwise that if they were given that type of assignment that they would think to do a plot summary.  While sorting through the transcripts, what is evident is that many students are not aware of the different types of summaries and what they are expected to do with them when addressed to do one by a professor. 
Literature Review:
A summary is developed after reading a piece of work and giving the main focus of it in a few short paragraphs and it is meant to not be as long as the work itself and should be cut by at least half of the work.  But some students do not understand that summarizing is not about copying it is about giving the facts.  But there are different ways of summarizing; plot summary is when you need to give main points to it, while interpretation summary is when you give you point of view as to what had happened.  While they both are taking information from a source, it leads into the issue of due students really understand how to do summaries effectively?
Writing from Sources, Writing from Sentences by Rebecca Moore Howard, Tricia Serviss, and Tanya K. Rodrigue explains that the fact that so many students leave out summary of sources shows that their practices of reading may not be as up to par as expected or should be.  Instead of taking the time to do a summary effectively, many are resulting to giving copied work or paraphrasing work and although they may list it as a source when the student is done, they are not giving their own interpretation of the events from the work, they are simply describing it to the audience in an incomplete, or unjustified way.  This is so because they may be either doing patchwork, or simply copying which is not only against academic integrity, but it also does not allow the student to expand their knowledge of a subject.
            The important rules to follow when summarizing are to delete material from the text, involve generalizing from specific sources, use specifics from the source, and make up your own interpretation of what was in the paragraphs.  But one of the most common methods of summarizing is to paraphrase a sentence and expand from that (Rebecca Moore Howard). 
Methods:                   
The participants of this study were chosen to get a sense of how different majors use and can understand the boundaries between the summaries whether they use them often or have only done them once in their college career.  The subjects chosen were not aware of what types of questions they would be asked and also all come from different majors so their academics vary. They were also chosen because they have taken courses where there is a lot of summarizing, or do a heavy amount of writing for their major, or so I thought. 
The subjects go by Claire, Mary, and Jana and all are college students.    Claire, a senior at Kean University who majors in Communications, was very confident during the interview and because there is a lot of writing in the communications major she answered everything thoroughly.  As opposed to Mary, a junior at Kean University seeking a degree in Marketing, seemed very much was lost during the interview and could not answer my questions as well as Claire had.  Jana is a freshman at Flagler College and has just started to observe what she will need for her degree as a Journalism major.  Jana and Claire seemed to be the two out of the three that had the most confidence in the interview and were not afraid to express what they had thought of the subject whether it was positively or negatively.   
Analysis of Transcripts:
            Starting with Claire it was noticeable that she was confident with the interview and had a lot to say.  Her body language screamed professional and the way she spoke was with confidence, which was another quality I also saw in Jana.  But, when interviewing Mary you could sense the nerves in her voice.  Initially when she asked what the interview would consist of it was explained that it would be about knowing the boundaries between summaries and if one understands them accurately.  Mary was still on board with doing the interview but you could hear the nerves in her voice as she seemed unsure if she was answering the questions well enough. 
            The focus with the interview questions was starting out simple.  The subjects were asked if they knew what a summary was and every one of them answered “yes”.  Expecting them to go on with their answers there was an awkward silence that filled the room so the next questions came forth sooner than expected.
Do you know what a summary is?
Claire:  A summary is a snapshot of an entire plot where you don’t need to exactly read every word but the summary gives you the descriptive details that you do need, they basically give you the gist of the story, like the character, the plot, maybe the conflict where they may at least attempt to give you the conflict in some type of way but not unreal the whole entire thing for you but a summary is just usually maybe a couple of sentences just to maybe give you an idea of the topic, or a story, or a subject or anything like that.
Mary:  Something that sums up the whole rest of your paper?

Jana:  A summary is a brief statement about something. 
                The next question goes into how much the subjects use the summaries for their major and if they understand what their professors expected out of them as they prepared themselves to write for assignments that required summaries.  When asked the question if they knew there was more than one type of summary, two out of three of them answered that they were in fact unaware of this and when explained about the difference between interpretation summaries and plot summaries they understood why interpretations would be what the professor wanted but would not classify it as a summary and would rather be told to do an interpretation to be clear.  What a lot of students fail to realize is that a lot of professors, when asking students to give them a summary they are expecting an interpretation summary, not a plot summary.  Any comments?
Jana:  The professors are right to ask this of students because they have already read or seen whatever they are assigning to the students, what they want to know is what it meant to the student
            This response held interest because Jana is correct, the professors have read these assignments they give us so many times and they are looking for what we think of it.  Because Jana uses the interpretation technique of a summary so often in her major, she understands that a professor is expecting you to tell them something they do not already know, something they may not have picked up from reading the material.  But to a lot of people that is not made clear and it although Jana had understood that her professors wanted interpretations, Claire and Mary were not so aware of this.  Mary felt that because her major does not deal with summaries as much as other majors she would not think to ever do an interpretation unless she had been given a case study to do for her marketing major.  Claire felt that it made sense for professors to want that out of their students but that they should differentiate between the summaries and specifically tell the students they want interpretations.  But in Claire’s transcript she had also stated that it is embedded into our minds to think to do summaries a certain way and that is why she would not have thought about using interpretations. 
            One specific question, “Do you think it’s more important to know an interpretation summary or a plot summary?” was answered by the subjects, with all of their answers being interpretation.  When asking them why they felt this way it was either they really understood why interpretations were really needed more of if they just knew that interpretations were better representations of a story.
Claire:  Because I mean, anybody could write verbatim, ya know, of a summary like finding a new way to rewrite a story without writing it the same exact way but interpretative makes it so much more about you and how you look at it and how you angle it so it makes you think more and think about it on your own versus kind of rewording what they have already written as a basic summary format.
Mary:  Because… It’s like a requirement to know that.
Jana:  It depends on the situation or the assignment. Some people want a plot summary and others want the interpretation. In my major, journalism, it is often what is assigned of you to do.
            While the subjects showed that it really does depend on your major how much you use writing and do summaries.  But the focus of this was to see who actually understood that there is more than one concept of a summary.  While the marketing department in Mary’s case would not require her to do much writing in general except for her case analysis.  Claire was using interpretations often in communications, but was not aware of the fact that she was doing a different form of a summary other than a plot summary.  What has been noticeable was that Jana was fully aware of the difference between interpretation and plot summaries and what her professors expect out of her.  Could it be that her professors, because she does attend a different school unlike the subjects that attend Kean, that she was told right from the beginning of her freshman year that her professors want interpretations?  Could it be that when she entered as a freshman to Flagler they had explained to her right off the bat the plot summaries are a thing of the past unless said otherwise?
Would you say it’s important to know and learn the basic concepts of a summary? 
Claire:  Um yeah I think it would help to have it not retaught to us but maybe mentioned to us again while we are in college because ya know some stuff you don’t always remember from college so to have a refresher I think that’s a good idea.            
Mary:  It depends on like what you want to do in life.
Jana:  Yes because there are times when your professor in school, or your boss at work wants a summary, but if you are unaware of how to give a proper summary then you are out of luck and either receive a low grade or your boss looks down on you now.
            While a refresher course may not be in the works any time soon, the ladies agree that it should be done, although Mary had said it depends on what you want to do she uses interpretations for her major often so if they dealt with that in a course then she agreed that it would be of help to those who need it.  While Jana and Claire agreed that the course should be offered but think maybe even mentioning it in freshman English would work also because it will allow the students to really understand the subject fully even if a course can’t be offered.
Conclusion/Limitations:
            For this specific study it was difficult to narrow down just to three people because it may have been easier if I had gotten information from people from more majors.  There just was not enough time, and it would of made the paper entirely too long, to go to one person from every major and get their input of what they consider to be a boundary between the summary and if the they fully understand what a professor wants from them as a student. 
All in all this experience showed me that not every major deals with the same material.  Although that was known when starting this, I really did not expect that one of my subjects really would not have much to say about their experiences with summaries and whether they actually use them in their fields.  It would be interesting to know how many other majors do not use summaries the majority of the time because there isn't much writing unless doing a case analysis.  That would be the only limitation that came with this research, because there are just too many people to interview and not enough time to go around to every major.   The differences between the summaries should be addressed by faculty of every major to the students as incoming freshman because the student body may be unaware of what they are meant to do for the professor’s assignments.   


Bibliography


Rebecca Moore Howard, Tricia Serviss, and Tanya K. Rodrigue. "Writing from Sources, Writing from Sentences." 2010. Writing & Pedagogy. 22 April 2014 <http://justinlewis.me/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/Howard-Serviss-Rodrigue-Writing-from-Sources.pdf>.

Thursday, April 24, 2014

23. Part of conclusion

The conclusion for me is still a work in progress, mostly because I am not yet sure how to end it since I feel that I end it abruptly.  Should I add anything else to the conclusion?

All in all this experience showed me that not every major deals with the same material.  Although that was known when starting this, I really did not expect that one of my subjects really would not have much to say about their experiences with summaries and whether they actually use them in their fields.  It would be interesting to know how many other majors do not use summaries the majority of the time because there isn't much writing unless doing a case analysis.  That would be the only limitation that came with this research, because there are just too many people to interview and not enough time to go around to every major.   

22. What I worked on in class (methods section)

I had written this for my methods portion but I am unsure if I started out correctly or if I should add more detail.

                         All the participants were Kean University students, all were different majors, who will go by Claire, Mary, and Melina.  The participants were chosen to get a sense of how different majors use and can understand summaries whether they use them often or have only done them once in their college career. 
Claire, a senior who majors in Communications, was very confident during the interview and because there is a lot of writing in the communications major she answered everything thoroughly.  As opposed to Mary, a junior seeking a degree in Marketing, who very much was lost during the interview and could not answer my questions as thoroughly.

Thursday, April 17, 2014

21. Post what we did in class

A good portion of this is what I did in class, but I also added a sentence of two. I had to go conduct one of the interviews right after the class and did not have time to formally add the transcript, which will probably be added to my next blog post.  This is what is to come...

While my subjects we quite cooperative with the interviews I had given them, some were not as responsive with what material they learned and their experiences with summaries because certain majors do not deal with analyzing and plots as much as others.  My interviews were short, but very to the point and only one of my subjects seemed to be uneasy when answering questions and it was obvious that although she understood the meaning of the questions and they were not difficult, during the interview there was a lot of hesitation and often times stuttering. 
                (POST PORTION OF TRANSCRIPT)

                

Tuesday, April 15, 2014

20. Statement of Focus

My statement of focus is still the boundaries of summaries and how we as college students think that professors asking for a summary want a plot summary and not an interpretation.  I have yet, due to scheduling reasons, to interview my next two subjects but I plan on asking the same questions and going by what they tell me in the transcript and developing from there what they think of a summary and if they feel it is important.  So far I have been trying to redo my intro for my new paper and figuring out how to still keep my first subject without using all the same exact information I had for the short analysis specifically.

19. Drafty Writing

I am having difficulty with my new intro and I think I will use the material I listed below to redo my intro as well as introducing the new subjects.  


  • In college, majors are different from one another and can have many components to them, but it doesn't necessarily mean that they do not use a lot of the same learning materials.  
  • Introduce other subjects and state their major's and their transcripts.  Then weave in first subject to compare the other two.
  • Define interpretations vs. plot summaries to give audience more of an idea of what you mean by interpretation.

Tuesday, April 8, 2014

18. Analytic Memos



My subject happened to be a Communications major, and although English is not the only major to use summaries as a curriculum, they may not use it as much as we do for work.  But as C, my subject, had expressed that she felt that she used the process of a summary more when she was a Freshman and Sophomore as opposed to her Junior and Senior year.  This part of the transcript stuck out the most to me when I was transcribing it,

S:  Yeah… so do you understand what a professor is expecting from you when they ask you for a summary?

C:  Uh, yes, I mean I feel like we have learned that so young and it has been embedded in our minds since we were in preschool and just the basic so I feel like now in college it’s almost second nature to ya know to pick a summary, to outline a summary or to do a summary.

Although it should be second nature to us at this point and time in our lives, it isn't and a lot of people are unaware of what a professor is expecting from us in a summary because we automatically assume to do a recap of what the piece is about.  So I think when interviewing my next two subjects I will ask them how they feel about this statement and how they think it can be fixed among others.

17. Digging Deeper

Data I plan on analyzing, besides what I have already, will be conducted with another subject and possibly another subject after them also.  I feel that for my first subject, although I got all the information I needed, I only had 6 questions and therefore in my opinion to get the length for the paper I need at least 2 more subjects and their explanations of my questions:

1.  Do you know what a summary is?
2.  Could you define a summary?
3.  How often would you say that you’ve used summaries in your major?
4.  Do you understand what a professor is expecting from you when they ask you for a summary?
5.  Are you aware that there are different types of summaries?

And from then on I would go on to ask if the subjects understand what a professor wants from them when asking for a summary.  From that and their responses I would try to dig deeper into why they think this way and why it is projected this way. 

16. (Re)Writing

What I hope to discover with this project is how people from multiple majors identify the boundaries of summaries and how they go about writing summaries.  As noted in my short analysis, there is a difference between interpretation summaries and plot summaries and what the professors expect from you when you write them.  So what I plan on doing to is focusing more on why the population of students believe that when referencing a summary it is to talk about what the piece was mostly about.  Also, as to why students need clarification on what the professor is asking for in terms of interpretation.

Tuesday, April 1, 2014

15. Short Analysis Project



The Summary Exposed
            While giving an interview, one should always try and stay calm, or at least appear as if they are calm.  While S, the interviewer, knew C, the subject, very well it starts off as what seems to be a regular conversation and then S immediately jumps into the questioning, which didn’t exactly give off the calm vibe, but they just kept going with it but with her jumping right in it shows that S wants to immediately start the interview.  C is not reluctant to answer anything and answers the questions completely and to the best of her knowledge. 
            The interview questions are based off of the knowledge of summaries and if one understands the difference between the different types of summaries when asked to present one to a professor or audience.  As S asks C to give her interpretation of what a summary is:
S:   So do you know what a summary is?
C:  Yes.
S:  Could you define a summary?
C:  A summary is a snapshot of an entire plot where you don’t need to exactly read every  
     word but the summary gives you the descriptive details that you do need, they    
     basically give you the gist of the story, like the character, the plot, maybe the conflict
     where they may at least attempt to give you the conflict in some type of way but not
     unreal the whole entire thing for you but a summary is just usually maybe a couple of
     sentences just to maybe give you an idea of the topic, or a story, or a subject or
     anything like that.
            S had asked C to be her subject because C is a Communications major, which besides English majors they do a lot of writing and write a lot of papers. 
S:  How often would you say that you’ve used summaries in your major?
C:  For Comm, um, I think a lot, a lot of the times with your research projects and when
      I’m trying to gather sources for a paper I’ll ya know read the paper and try to give the
      summary of the source that I’m using so I won’t have to read the whole paper.  When   
      I’m ready to use the source I can write down maybe a couple sentences about the
      summary that I read and it will help me narrow it down with the sources that I need to
      use
            Clearly C is aware of what a summary is and her explanation of what a summary is isn’t wrong.  As S increasingly asks questions to get more in depth about the subject, C becomes a little confused as to why she is being asked these questions, but she is not uncomfortable in any way.  While S explains that there are different types of summaries and that the one C described the process of is a plot summary.  But S then goes on to explain that when a professor asks you for a summary, a lot of times it is for an interpretation summary, which is what you took from the story itself.  C was not so surprised when S had explained it to her but she felt that she needed to explain her experience with summaries and why she automatically would have thought to submit a plot summary and not an interpretation summary, or think to even ask the professor what they would specifically want in the summary.
            C explains that since kindergarten we are basically taught and have had it embedded in our minds to make sure that we understand that a summary is an explanation of what the piece of writing was about and although she clearly understood when S was explaining that that isn’t the only form of a summary, we automatically think to go to the plot summary.  Any normal person would think to go about with describing the plot, because that is what our culture is made to believe that we are suppose to follow instead of asking exactly what the professor would want. 
            Another thing that our culture is made to believe is that summaries are supposed to be short and sweet without giving away too much.  Many believe that the summaries should only be no more than two paragraphs, when in all actuality they should be answered completely and can be as long as you desire them to be.  We have been taught wrong as a culture and because of this a lot of college students, including English majors, are not aware of the different types of summaries that can be represented. 
            As C comes back to the interview and realizes what S has presented to her it is easy to see that she understands what was presented to her, but feels that she has been unaware of how to do assignments correctly.  C knows that both are important to know, but the expression she has almost questions how many assignments for English and Communications she had done wrong during her college career.         
S then asks C what she believes would be more important, to know a interpretation summary or a plot summary?  C answers with interpretation.     
S:  Why do you say that?
C:  Because I mean, anybody could write verbatim, ya know, of a summary like finding a  
      new way to rewrite a story without writing it the same exact way but interpretative
      makes it so much more about you and how you look at it and how you angle it so it
      makes you think more and think about it on your own versus kind of rewording what
      they have already written as a basic summary format.
S:  Yeah, would you say it’s important to know and learn the basic concepts of a
     summary? 
C:  Um yeah I think it would help to have it not retaught to us but maybe mentioned to us    
    again while we are in college because ya know some stuff you don’t always remember   
    from college so to have a refresher I think that’s a good idea.     
The main point for S’s interview was so that it was known that interpretations need to seen as an effective summary.  S got her point across to C, and C agreed that there should be a refresher course and maybe even a course where developing interpretations is the main focus.  With a successful interview and showing calmness and professionalism, S had allowed for C to take control of the interview but while still holding the reins.   With the short transcript being of only 931 words, S had only displayed 239 words, allowing the majority of the conversation to be done by C with 652 words. 
C did not overstate anything really essential, such a phrase like “I did this…” or “It was hard…”.  It wasn’t like that in the conversation with S, but once S had made sure C was done and if she had anything else to contribute about her experiences with summaries in any way, whether they were positive for grades or negative, and she felt she expressed everything to as best her knowledge as possible. 
Experiences with summaries are not just part of the English curriculum and the reasons behind why S asked C to be her subject is because of the differences between the English and Communications majors.  Many majors require major writing and details in their writing and learning about others experiences with it is why the subject was chosen outside of the English major.